- Summarizing Scientific Articles: Experiments With Relevance And Rhetorical Status ^96d40c
- “summarization of scientific articles that concentrates on the rhetorical status of statements in an article”
- created their own gold-standard corpus with human judgements based on CL papers
- interesting discussion on the relevance of scientific argumentation as a social act → convincing instead of creating facts (tug’o’war!)
- test annotators ability to decide between OWN and OTHER attributions (very clear in abstracts, less so in the entire document)
- ABSTRACTS DO NOT CONTAIN ALL RELEVANT PARTS OF THE ARGUMENT OF A SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE!